From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 6587 invoked by alias); 9 Apr 2003 21:59:16 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sources.redhat.com Received: (qmail 6580 invoked from network); 9 Apr 2003 21:59:15 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO takamaka.act-europe.fr) (205.232.38.116) by sources.redhat.com with SMTP; 9 Apr 2003 21:59:15 -0000 Received: by takamaka.act-europe.fr (Postfix, from userid 507) id EFACBD34B8; Wed, 9 Apr 2003 17:59:14 -0400 (EDT) Date: Wed, 09 Apr 2003 21:59:00 -0000 From: Joel Brobecker To: Andrew Cagney Cc: gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com Subject: Re: [RFA] Add missing struct gdbarch opaque def to frame.h Message-ID: <20030409215914.GR1170@gnat.com> References: <20030409210346.GQ1170@gnat.com> <3E948F8F.4090201@redhat.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <3E948F8F.4090201@redhat.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4i X-SW-Source: 2003-04/txt/msg00184.txt.bz2 > >2003-04-09 J. Brobecker > > > > * frame.h (struct gdbarch): Add opaque structure definition > > to avoid a compilation warning on LynxOS 4.0. > > Yes, obvious. Does this mean I can't delete LynxOS? Thanks, it's in. As for deleting LynxOS, I can't really make a comment about that just yet. I am still at the experimenting stage trying to build the x86-lynx native version, see what I get. MarkK might want to comment about this too. It looks like there has been very little activity happening on this port, and the code also seems to have suffered from bitrot, so I am not sure what is best at this point: - start over from scratch - start from what we have, and bring the LynxOS port back afloat. I only have until tonight to get it to build. I will send a note to this list summarizing a bit what I did. -- Joel