From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 23599 invoked by alias); 7 Apr 2003 14:03:33 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sources.redhat.com Received: (qmail 23592 invoked from network); 7 Apr 2003 14:03:32 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.cs.umass.edu) (128.119.243.168) by sources.redhat.com with SMTP; 7 Apr 2003 14:03:32 -0000 Received: from localhost (IDENT:ffZkSzHn9SPJLR7kUalK68mdDrseLFRZ@loki.cs.umass.edu [128.119.243.168]) by mail.cs.umass.edu (8.12.6/8.12.5) with ESMTP id h37E2b99016546; Mon, 7 Apr 2003 10:02:37 -0400 Date: Mon, 07 Apr 2003 14:03:00 -0000 Message-Id: <20030407.100240.21905392.kazu@cs.umass.edu> To: msnyder@redhat.com Cc: gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com, dvenkat@noida.hcltech.com, avolkov@transas.com, cagney@redhat.com Subject: Re: h8/300 sim tests From: Kazu Hirata In-Reply-To: <3E917FF6.4699C121@redhat.com> References: <3E917FF6.4699C121@redhat.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Spam-Checked: This message probably not SPAM X-Spam-Score: -19.8, Required: 5 X-Spam-Tests: IN_REP_TO,QUOTED_EMAIL_TEXT,REFERENCES,REPLY_WITH_QUOTES X-Spam-Report: ---- Start SpamAssassin results -19.80 points, 5 required; * -6.6 -- Has a valid-looking References header * -3.3 -- Has a In-Reply-To header * -3.3 -- BODY: Contains what looks like a quoted email text * -6.6 -- Reply with quoted text ---- End of SpamAssassin results X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.30 (www . roaringpenguin . com / mimedefang) X-SW-Source: 2003-04/txt/msg00114.txt.bz2 Hi Michael, > I've been working on some tests for the h8/300 simulator, and I've > decided they're ready for contribution. I hope this framework will > make it easy for others to add tests (hint hint file i/o cmdline). > These are meant to go in a new directory sim/testsuite/sim/h8300. This is cool, especially because the simulator are not good at simulating instructions that gcc does not output. :-( > You'll immediately see from this that I'm also working on adding > the h8sx architecture. Look for that submission shortly. These > tests will work as is, without that submission, with just a few > failures (which probably represent existing bugs). Would you mind sharing some of the failures you've found? Kazu Hirata