From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 4998 invoked by alias); 28 Mar 2003 16:05:11 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sources.redhat.com Received: (qmail 4979 invoked from network); 28 Mar 2003 16:05:10 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO white) (68.14.146.65) by sources.redhat.com with SMTP; 28 Mar 2003 16:05:10 -0000 Received: from bob by white with local (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian)) id 18ywLt-0001r2-00; Fri, 28 Mar 2003 11:05:09 -0500 Date: Fri, 28 Mar 2003 16:05:00 -0000 From: Bob Rossi To: Andrew Cagney Cc: gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com Subject: Re: Adding -file-list-exec-source-file command to GDB/MI Message-ID: <20030328160509.GD6871@white> Mail-Followup-To: Andrew Cagney , gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com References: <20030320224454.GA14096@white> <3E846A8A.3020700@redhat.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <3E846A8A.3020700@redhat.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.3.28i X-SW-Source: 2003-03/txt/msg00568.txt.bz2 In the situation were a multi file patch needs correcting. Should only the file that needs correcting be reposted? Or should the entire multi file patch be reposted when a part of it is corrected? Bobby On Fri, Mar 28, 2003 at 10:30:18AM -0500, Andrew Cagney wrote: > > > * mi-cmd-file.c: Added file to implement mi file commands. > > I think that file was lost? > > > @subsubheading Example > > N.A. > > > >+ @subheading The @code{-file-list-exec-source-file} Command > >+ @findex -file-list-exec-source-file > >+ > >+ @subsubheading Synopsis > >+ > >+ @example > >+ -file-list-exec-source-file > >+ @end example > >+ > >+ List the current source file and line for the current executable. > > FYI, I just fixed/merged that file. It now uses @smallexample which is > consistent with the rest of the manual. > > Can you please extend this so that it includes example output. > > Andrew >