From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gdb-patches-return-23527-listarch-gdb-patches=sources.redhat.com@sources.redhat.com>
Received: (qmail 24689 invoked by alias); 27 Mar 2003 19:03:51 -0000
Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Subscribe: <mailto:gdb-patches-subscribe@sources.redhat.com>
List-Archive: <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/gdb-patches/>
List-Post: <mailto:gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com>
List-Help: <mailto:gdb-patches-help@sources.redhat.com>, <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/#faqs>
Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sources.redhat.com
Received: (qmail 24681 invoked from network); 27 Mar 2003 19:03:50 -0000
Received: from unknown (HELO duracef.shout.net) (204.253.184.12)
  by sources.redhat.com with SMTP; 27 Mar 2003 19:03:50 -0000
Received: (from mec@localhost)
	by duracef.shout.net (8.11.6/8.11.6) id h2RJ3mr04017;
	Thu, 27 Mar 2003 13:03:48 -0600
Date: Thu, 27 Mar 2003 19:03:00 -0000
From: Michael Elizabeth Chastain <mec@shout.net>
Message-Id: <200303271903.h2RJ3mr04017@duracef.shout.net>
To: ac131313@redhat.com
Subject: Re: [PING/testsuite] new test gdb.base/pr-1090.exp
Cc: fnasser@redhat.com, gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com
X-SW-Source: 2003-03/txt/msg00555.txt.bz2

ac> Yes, ok, but, apparently the file name convention is pr1090 rather than 
ac> pr-1090.

There appear to be two conventions in use:

  gdb.c++/pr-1023.exp
  gdb.c++/pr-574.exp
  gdb.mi/gdb669.exp
  gdb.mi/gdb680.exp
  gdb.mi/gdb701.exp
  gdb.mi/gdb792.exp

I didn't see any files like 'pr1090'.

It's just a convention so whatever you want to bless is okay with me.

Michael C