From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 27383 invoked by alias); 26 Mar 2003 17:48:21 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sources.redhat.com Received: (qmail 27376 invoked from network); 26 Mar 2003 17:48:20 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO duracef.shout.net) (204.253.184.12) by sources.redhat.com with SMTP; 26 Mar 2003 17:48:20 -0000 Received: (from mec@localhost) by duracef.shout.net (8.11.6/8.11.6) id h2QHmKr16829; Wed, 26 Mar 2003 11:48:20 -0600 Date: Wed, 26 Mar 2003 17:48:00 -0000 From: Michael Elizabeth Chastain Message-Id: <200303261748.h2QHmKr16829@duracef.shout.net> To: gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com, jingham@apple.com Subject: Re: [rfc breakpoint] Catch exceptions X-SW-Source: 2003-03/txt/msg00517.txt.bz2 Hi Jim, > BTW. The more general problem of a symbol resolving to multiple > instances - for instance setting file:line breakpoints in inlined > functions or template method defn's - is something we need to address. > It really ticks off our C++ friends. And with gcc 3, it happens with constructors and destructors, because the compiler emits multiple object code functions for each constructor and each constructor. This shows up multiple times in the PR database, which means many users are unhappy with it. Just another voice of gloom, Michael C