From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 15028 invoked by alias); 25 Mar 2003 15:37:20 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sources.redhat.com Received: (qmail 15017 invoked from network); 25 Mar 2003 15:37:15 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO fw-cam.cambridge.arm.com) (193.131.176.3) by sources.redhat.com with SMTP; 25 Mar 2003 15:37:15 -0000 Received: by fw-cam.cambridge.arm.com; id PAA29442; Tue, 25 Mar 2003 15:37:09 GMT Received: from unknown(172.16.1.2) by fw-cam.cambridge.arm.com via smap (V5.5) id xma029235; Tue, 25 Mar 03 15:36:49 GMT Received: from pc960.cambridge.arm.com (pc960.cambridge.arm.com [10.1.205.4]) by cam-admin0.cambridge.arm.com (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id PAA08993; Tue, 25 Mar 2003 15:36:48 GMT Received: from pc960.cambridge.arm.com (rearnsha@localhost) by pc960.cambridge.arm.com (8.11.6/8.9.3) with ESMTP id h2PFamF13366; Tue, 25 Mar 2003 15:36:48 GMT Message-Id: <200303251536.h2PFamF13366@pc960.cambridge.arm.com> X-Authentication-Warning: pc960.cambridge.arm.com: rearnsha owned process doing -bs To: Andrew Cagney cc: Richard.Earnshaw@arm.com, gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com Reply-To: Richard.Earnshaw@arm.com Organization: ARM Ltd. X-Telephone: +44 1223 400569 (direct+voicemail), +44 1223 400400 (switchbd) X-Fax: +44 1223 400410 X-Address: ARM Ltd., 110 Fulbourn Road, Cherry Hinton, Cambridge CB1 9NJ. Subject: Re: PATCH ARM add new set/show arm commands In-reply-to: Your message of "Tue, 25 Mar 2003 10:19:41 EST." <3E80738D.6050405@redhat.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/mixed ; boundary="==_Exmh_16683912830" Date: Tue, 25 Mar 2003 15:37:00 -0000 From: Richard Earnshaw X-SW-Source: 2003-03/txt/msg00489.txt.bz2 This is a multipart MIME message. --==_Exmh_16683912830 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-length: 362 > > I think I'd rather keep the option as "set arm disassembler" to make these > > distinctions clear. Thoughts? > > M'kay. Can you add a note to that effect to the bug report (the i386 > needs a similar treatment). > 2003-03-25 Richard Earnshaw PR cli/548 * arm-tdep.c (_initialize_arm_tdep): Command is "set arm disassembler". --==_Exmh_16683912830 Content-Type: text/plain ; name="gdb-disopt.patch"; charset=us-ascii Content-Description: gdb-disopt.patch Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="gdb-disopt.patch" Content-length: 812 Index: arm-tdep.c =================================================================== RCS file: /cvs/src/src/gdb/arm-tdep.c,v retrieving revision 1.113 diff -p -r1.113 arm-tdep.c *** arm-tdep.c 25 Mar 2003 14:52:33 -0000 1.113 --- arm-tdep.c 25 Mar 2003 15:31:49 -0000 *************** _initialize_arm_tdep (void) *** 3164,3170 **** "show arm disassembly"); /* And now add the new interface. */ ! new_set = add_set_enum_cmd ("disassembly", no_class, valid_disassembly_styles, &disassembly_style, helptext, &setarmcmdlist); --- 3164,3170 ---- "show arm disassembly"); /* And now add the new interface. */ ! new_set = add_set_enum_cmd ("disassembler", no_class, valid_disassembly_styles, &disassembly_style, helptext, &setarmcmdlist); --==_Exmh_16683912830--