From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 11527 invoked by alias); 24 Mar 2003 09:48:15 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sources.redhat.com Received: (qmail 11474 invoked from network); 24 Mar 2003 09:48:01 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO fw-cam.cambridge.arm.com) (193.131.176.3) by sources.redhat.com with SMTP; 24 Mar 2003 09:48:01 -0000 Received: by fw-cam.cambridge.arm.com; id JAA05113; Mon, 24 Mar 2003 09:48:00 GMT Received: from unknown(172.16.1.2) by fw-cam.cambridge.arm.com via smap (V5.5) id xma004469; Mon, 24 Mar 03 09:47:15 GMT Received: from pc960.cambridge.arm.com (pc960.cambridge.arm.com [10.1.205.4]) by cam-admin0.cambridge.arm.com (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id JAA12991; Mon, 24 Mar 2003 09:47:15 GMT Received: from pc960.cambridge.arm.com (rearnsha@localhost) by pc960.cambridge.arm.com (8.11.6/8.9.3) with ESMTP id h2O9lEZ29462; Mon, 24 Mar 2003 09:47:14 GMT Message-Id: <200303240947.h2O9lEZ29462@pc960.cambridge.arm.com> X-Authentication-Warning: pc960.cambridge.arm.com: rearnsha owned process doing -bs To: Andrew Cagney cc: Richard.Earnshaw@arm.com, gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com Reply-To: Richard.Earnshaw@arm.com Organization: ARM Ltd. X-Telephone: +44 1223 400569 (direct+voicemail), +44 1223 400400 (switchbd) X-Fax: +44 1223 400410 X-Address: ARM Ltd., 110 Fulbourn Road, Cherry Hinton, Cambridge CB1 9NJ. Subject: Re: PATCH ARM add new set/show arm commands In-reply-to: Your message of "Sat, 22 Mar 2003 17:20:17 EST." <3E7CE1A1.5080108@redhat.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Date: Mon, 24 Mar 2003 09:48:00 -0000 From: Richard Earnshaw X-SW-Source: 2003-03/txt/msg00468.txt.bz2 > > This patch starts the process of moving the arm-specific set/show options > > into a sub-group. For the moment I've only done this for the set/show > > disassembly-flavor command, where I've also taken the opportunity to drop > > "flavor" from the command (it's non-intuitive if you speak English-English > > :-) > > See: set [?] disassembler, replace disassembly-flavour or flavor[sic] > http://sources.redhat.com/cgi-bin/gnatsweb.pl?cmd=view%20audit-trail&database=gdb&pr=548 > > enjoy, > Andrew > > > > So we now have > > > > set arm disassembly > > > > and > > > > show arm disassembly Are you suggesting I should change the option name to "set arm disassembler"? If so, I've no problem with that. If not, what are you suggesting? Currently ARM does not support a "set arm architecture", though it might be needed for supporting interworking binaries and calls to functions from gdb. R.