From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 11805 invoked by alias); 16 Mar 2003 12:48:28 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sources.redhat.com Received: (qmail 11545 invoked from network); 16 Mar 2003 12:48:26 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO walton.kettenis.dyndns.org) (62.163.169.212) by sources.redhat.com with SMTP; 16 Mar 2003 12:48:26 -0000 Received: from elgar.kettenis.dyndns.org (elgar.kettenis.dyndns.org [192.168.0.2]) by walton.kettenis.dyndns.org (8.12.6/8.12.5) with ESMTP id h2GCmIiB000379; Sun, 16 Mar 2003 13:48:18 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from kettenis@elgar.kettenis.dyndns.org) Received: from elgar.kettenis.dyndns.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by elgar.kettenis.dyndns.org (8.12.6/8.12.6) with ESMTP id h2GCmIWI004528; Sun, 16 Mar 2003 13:48:18 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from kettenis@elgar.kettenis.dyndns.org) Received: (from kettenis@localhost) by elgar.kettenis.dyndns.org (8.12.6/8.12.6/Submit) id h2GCmHwN004525; Sun, 16 Mar 2003 13:48:17 +0100 (CET) Date: Sun, 16 Mar 2003 12:48:00 -0000 Message-Id: <200303161248.h2GCmHwN004525@elgar.kettenis.dyndns.org> From: Mark Kettenis To: mludvig@suse.cz CC: gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com, ac131313@redhat.com In-reply-to: <3E71F890.7090304@suse.cz> (message from Michal Ludvig on Fri, 14 Mar 2003 16:43:12 +0100) Subject: Re: [offbyone RFC] Merge i386newframe References: <3E6FAF64.7070304@suse.cz> <3E71F890.7090304@suse.cz> X-SW-Source: 2003-03/txt/msg00344.txt.bz2 Date: Fri, 14 Mar 2003 16:43:12 +0100 From: Michal Ludvig Hi all, I've reworked the merge a little to avoid the need to reorder frame.c:get_prev_frame() and fixed the 'next' and 'return' bugs that were in the prevoius one. Now it passes the testsuite even better than the i386newframe code did :-) I'm sorry I'm short of time to write more now. Andrew and Mark, please look around the patch and tell me your opinions. Michal, I appreciate your efforts here, but your patch introduces Linux-specific code into i386-tdep.c. I'm sorry, but we can't have that. I'll try to keep my i386newframe branch synced with HEAD. I'm afraid I don't have the time now to keep track of the offbyone branch right now, but as Andrew merges things from there, I'll pick them up in i386newframe. I'll certainly take a look at your patch, and incorporate the good bits. Mark