From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 14640 invoked by alias); 14 Mar 2003 20:29:27 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sources.redhat.com Received: (qmail 14552 invoked from network); 14 Mar 2003 20:29:27 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mx1.redhat.com) (66.187.233.31) by sources.redhat.com with SMTP; 14 Mar 2003 20:29:27 -0000 Received: from int-mx1.corp.redhat.com (int-mx1.corp.redhat.com [172.16.52.254]) by mx1.redhat.com (8.11.6/8.11.6) with ESMTP id h2EKTQQ03489; Fri, 14 Mar 2003 15:29:26 -0500 Received: from post-office.corp.redhat.com (post-office.corp.redhat.com [172.16.52.227]) by int-mx1.corp.redhat.com (8.11.6/8.11.6) with ESMTP id h2EKTQV22091; Fri, 14 Mar 2003 15:29:26 -0500 Received: from greed.delorie.com (dj.cipe.redhat.com [10.0.0.222]) by post-office.corp.redhat.com (8.11.6/8.11.6) with ESMTP id h2EKTQQ20872; Fri, 14 Mar 2003 15:29:26 -0500 Received: (from dj@localhost) by greed.delorie.com (8.11.6/8.11.6) id h2EKTLW10515; Fri, 14 Mar 2003 15:29:21 -0500 Date: Fri, 14 Mar 2003 20:29:00 -0000 Message-Id: <200303142029.h2EKTLW10515@greed.delorie.com> From: DJ Delorie To: neroden@twcny.rr.com CC: gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org, gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com, binutils@sources.redhat.com In-reply-to: <20030307022619.GA28395@doctormoo> (message from Nathanael Nerode on Thu, 6 Mar 2003 21:26:19 -0500) Subject: Re: [patch] toplevel Makefile.tpl cleanup 6/n References: <20030307022619.GA28395@doctormoo> X-SW-Source: 2003-03/txt/msg00337.txt.bz2 > Obvious rearrangement and commenting; it's best if these are right up > top where they're easily identified. > > * Makefile.tpl: Move .NOEXPORT, MAKEOVERRIDES up. > * Makefile.in: Regenerate. This one turns out to be wrong. .NOEXPORT: is a target. You made it the first target. Now if you type "make" (except for GNU make) it rebuilds the file ".NOEXPORT" and quits. Please move the pseudo-targets down past the first real target. Given that top-of-file is bad, bottom-of-file is probably the next best place (i.e. where they started out from).