From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 4949 invoked by alias); 12 Mar 2003 06:09:49 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sources.redhat.com Received: (qmail 4942 invoked from network); 12 Mar 2003 06:09:48 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO duracef.shout.net) (204.253.184.12) by 172.16.49.205 with SMTP; 12 Mar 2003 06:09:48 -0000 Received: (from mec@localhost) by duracef.shout.net (8.11.6/8.11.6) id h2C69h904491; Wed, 12 Mar 2003 00:09:43 -0600 Date: Wed, 12 Mar 2003 06:09:00 -0000 From: Michael Elizabeth Chastain Message-Id: <200303120609.h2C69h904491@duracef.shout.net> To: ac131313@redhat.com, bob_rossi@cox.net, gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com, nick@nick.uklinux.net Subject: Re: [rfc] Annotation level THREE X-SW-Source: 2003-03/txt/msg00272.txt.bz2 Hi Andrew, > With this and its doco in, I think 5.4 is clear to go (or at least try to). The last time I looked in detail was 2003-02-16: http://sources.redhat.com/ml/gdb/2003-02/msg00257.html At that time, there were still several high priority PR's about build issues; x86-64 regresions; and java fails the 'break main' test. Do you care about any of these things? Michael C