From: Daniel Jacobowitz <drow@mvista.com>
To: gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com
Subject: Re: [commit] new observer.[hc] files
Date: Fri, 28 Feb 2003 16:39:00 -0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20030228163953.GB24652@nevyn.them.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <3E5F8B86.9080902@redhat.com>
On Fri, Feb 28, 2003 at 11:17:10AM -0500, Andrew Cagney wrote:
> >static void
> >>observer_normal_stop_notification_stub (const void *data,
> >> const void *unused_args)
> >>{
> >> observer_normal_stop_ftype *notify = (observer_normal_stop_ftype *)
> >> data;
> >> (*notify) ();
> >>}
> >
> >
> >Is this extra indirection really necessary? Because I'm 99% sure it
> >won't work on several 64-bit platforms. Function pointers and data
> >pointers are not required to have the same size; on IA-64 I believe
> >that a function pointer is 128 bits and a data pointer is 64 bits.
>
> Like the PowerABI? That has a 32 bit pointer but a 64 bit function
> descriptor. void* ends up containing the address of the function
> descriptor. Anyway, "defs.h" has the comment:
>
> /* NOTE: cagney/2000-03-04: This typedef is strictly for the
> make_cleanup function declarations below. Do not use this typedef
> as a cast when passing functions into the make_cleanup() code.
> Instead either use a bounce function or add a wrapper function.
> Calling a f(char*) function with f(void*) is non-portable. */
> typedef void (make_cleanup_ftype) (void *);
>
> Once the code gets converted into a SED script, it can always be changed
> to something more strict.
>
> >Why not require all observer functions to take the same arguments
> >instead?
>
> Per the original thread, it is to ensure strongly typed interfaces.
OK, that makes good sense. Anyway, my concerns about casting a
function pointer to void* seem to have be moot; we can eliminate some
of the grossness when/if this becomes a generated file.
--
Daniel Jacobowitz
MontaVista Software Debian GNU/Linux Developer
prev parent reply other threads:[~2003-02-28 16:39 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2003-02-28 7:38 Joel Brobecker
2003-02-28 15:22 ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2003-02-28 16:10 ` Andreas Schwab
2003-02-28 16:14 ` Andrew Cagney
2003-02-28 16:39 ` Daniel Jacobowitz [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20030228163953.GB24652@nevyn.them.org \
--to=drow@mvista.com \
--cc=gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox