From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gdb-patches-return-22931-listarch-gdb-patches=sources.redhat.com@sources.redhat.com>
Received: (qmail 6347 invoked by alias); 27 Feb 2003 21:51:08 -0000
Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Subscribe: <mailto:gdb-patches-subscribe@sources.redhat.com>
List-Archive: <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/gdb-patches/>
List-Post: <mailto:gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com>
List-Help: <mailto:gdb-patches-help@sources.redhat.com>, <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/#faqs>
Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sources.redhat.com
Received: (qmail 6328 invoked from network); 27 Feb 2003 21:51:08 -0000
Received: from unknown (HELO duracef.shout.net) (204.253.184.12)
  by 172.16.49.205 with SMTP; 27 Feb 2003 21:51:08 -0000
Received: (from mec@localhost)
	by duracef.shout.net (8.11.6/8.11.6) id h1RLp4t20463;
	Thu, 27 Feb 2003 15:51:04 -0600
Date: Thu, 27 Feb 2003 21:51:00 -0000
From: Michael Elizabeth Chastain <mec@shout.net>
Message-Id: <200302272151.h1RLp4t20463@duracef.shout.net>
To: carlton@math.stanford.edu, gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com
Subject: Re: [patch] fix spurious FAIL in templates.exp
Cc: drow@mvista.com
X-SW-Source: 2003-02/txt/msg00789.txt.bz2

dc> So this patch modifies that test and its twin to accept an optional
dc> const there.

That's entirely cool with me.  If the output is correct, and if it
doesn't mislead the user somehow, then accept it.

Michael C