From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 26604 invoked by alias); 26 Feb 2003 18:39:16 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sources.redhat.com Received: (qmail 26595 invoked from network); 26 Feb 2003 18:39:14 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO takamaka.act-europe.fr) (142.179.108.108) by 172.16.49.205 with SMTP; 26 Feb 2003 18:39:14 -0000 Received: by takamaka.act-europe.fr (Postfix, from userid 507) id C9A69D34B6; Wed, 26 Feb 2003 10:39:12 -0800 (PST) Date: Wed, 26 Feb 2003 18:39:00 -0000 From: Joel Brobecker To: Michael Elizabeth Chastain Cc: gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com Subject: Re: [rfa] gdb_thread_db.h: #errror if no uintptr_t Message-ID: <20030226183912.GE910@gnat.com> References: <200302261719.h1QHJb227567@duracef.shout.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <200302261719.h1QHJb227567@duracef.shout.net> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4i X-SW-Source: 2003-02/txt/msg00724.txt.bz2 > +#ifndef HAVE_UINTPTR_T > +#error No uintptr_t available; your C library is too old. > +/* Inhibit further compilation errors after this error. */ > +#define uintptr_t void * > +#endif Forgive my curiosity, why adding the "#define uintptr_t"? Isn't the compilation going to stop with the #error message anyway? -- Joel