From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 23523 invoked by alias); 26 Feb 2003 14:59:43 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sources.redhat.com Received: (qmail 23489 invoked from network); 26 Feb 2003 14:59:41 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO crack.them.org) (65.125.64.184) by 172.16.49.205 with SMTP; 26 Feb 2003 14:59:41 -0000 Received: from nevyn.them.org ([66.93.61.169] ident=mail) by crack.them.org with asmtp (Exim 3.12 #1 (Debian)) id 18o4vG-0001YD-00; Wed, 26 Feb 2003 11:00:46 -0600 Received: from drow by nevyn.them.org with local (Exim 3.36 #1 (Debian)) id 18o320-0002di-00; Wed, 26 Feb 2003 09:59:36 -0500 Date: Wed, 26 Feb 2003 14:59:00 -0000 From: Daniel Jacobowitz To: Michael Elizabeth Chastain Cc: gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com Subject: Re: [rfa] configure: new variable HAVE_UINTPTR_T Message-ID: <20030226145935.GA10129@nevyn.them.org> Mail-Followup-To: Michael Elizabeth Chastain , gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com References: <200302261445.h1QEjkq25333@duracef.shout.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <200302261445.h1QEjkq25333@duracef.shout.net> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.1i X-SW-Source: 2003-02/txt/msg00701.txt.bz2 On Wed, Feb 26, 2003 at 08:45:46AM -0600, Michael Elizabeth Chastain wrote: > Draft #3. Following Daniel J's advice, I use AC_CACHE_CHECK and the > multi-argument form of AC_DEFINE. I re-tested with and without > uintptr_t in /usr/include/stdint.h to hit both paths. > > I also learned that config.in is a regenerated file, not a hand-edited > file. And by using multi-argument AC_DEFINE I dropped the change to > > I don't show diffs for regenerated 'configure' and 'config.in'. I > regenerated with stock autoconf 2.13 and autoheader 2.13 from > ftp.gnu.org. > > Again, this is so that the gdb build can do something better when > it needs uintptr_t and doesn't have it (pr gdb/660). My notion of > 'something better' is going to be to spit out a better error message, > not to actually work. Somebody has to have a really old libc > (more than 3 years old) to get this message, but with millions of > users, some people do. > > OK to commit? Yes, thank you. > 2003-02-26 Michael Chastain > > * configure.in: New variable HAVE_UINTPTR_T. > * configure, config.in: Regenerated. -- Daniel Jacobowitz MontaVista Software Debian GNU/Linux Developer