From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gdb-patches-return-22796-listarch-gdb-patches=sources.redhat.com@sources.redhat.com>
Received: (qmail 8656 invoked by alias); 25 Feb 2003 20:08:32 -0000
Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Subscribe: <mailto:gdb-patches-subscribe@sources.redhat.com>
List-Archive: <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/gdb-patches/>
List-Post: <mailto:gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com>
List-Help: <mailto:gdb-patches-help@sources.redhat.com>, <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/#faqs>
Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sources.redhat.com
Received: (qmail 8648 invoked from network); 25 Feb 2003 20:08:31 -0000
Received: from unknown (HELO duracef.shout.net) (204.253.184.12)
  by 172.16.49.205 with SMTP; 25 Feb 2003 20:08:31 -0000
Received: (from mec@localhost)
	by duracef.shout.net (8.11.6/8.11.6) id h1PK8Ti10279;
	Tue, 25 Feb 2003 14:08:29 -0600
Date: Tue, 25 Feb 2003 20:08:00 -0000
From: Michael Elizabeth Chastain <mec@shout.net>
Message-Id: <200302252008.h1PK8Ti10279@duracef.shout.net>
To: ac131313@redhat.com
Subject: Re: [rfa] PROBLEMS (i[3456]86-*-linux*): Require glibc 2.1.3 or later
Cc: gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com
X-SW-Source: 2003-02/txt/msg00654.txt.bz2

Andrew C says:

  I think this is the best option.  And, say have gdb_thread_db.h have:

  #ifndef HAVE_UINTPTR_T
  #error "..... (your glibc is too old?)"
  #endif

Sounds good to me.  I'll go write my first configure.in patch!

Michael C