From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 890 invoked by alias); 25 Feb 2003 18:13:46 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sources.redhat.com Received: (qmail 878 invoked from network); 25 Feb 2003 18:13:45 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO duracef.shout.net) (204.253.184.12) by 172.16.49.205 with SMTP; 25 Feb 2003 18:13:45 -0000 Received: (from mec@localhost) by duracef.shout.net (8.11.6/8.11.6) id h1PIDgY08374; Tue, 25 Feb 2003 12:13:42 -0600 Date: Tue, 25 Feb 2003 18:13:00 -0000 From: Michael Elizabeth Chastain Message-Id: <200302251813.h1PIDgY08374@duracef.shout.net> To: brobecker@gnat.com Subject: Re: [rfa] PROBLEMS (i[3456]86-*-linux*): Require glibc 2.1.3 or later Cc: ac131313@redhat.com, gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com X-SW-Source: 2003-02/txt/msg00646.txt.bz2 Joel B asks: > Why not even fail at autoconf time? Because configure does not know which hosts need uintptr_t. Meanwhile, I would like to get approval (or rejection) on my proposed addition to PROBLEMS. Even if we add autoconf stuff for this, I think we still need a note in PROBLEMS about it. Michael C