From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 13317 invoked by alias); 23 Feb 2003 18:58:03 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sources.redhat.com Received: (qmail 13310 invoked from network); 23 Feb 2003 18:58:02 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO duracef.shout.net) (204.253.184.12) by 172.16.49.205 with SMTP; 23 Feb 2003 18:58:02 -0000 Received: (from mec@localhost) by duracef.shout.net (8.11.6/8.11.6) id h1NIw0Y31766; Sun, 23 Feb 2003 12:58:00 -0600 Date: Sun, 23 Feb 2003 18:58:00 -0000 From: Michael Elizabeth Chastain Message-Id: <200302231858.h1NIw0Y31766@duracef.shout.net> To: ac131313@redhat.com Subject: Re: [RFA] Testsuite: fix attach.exp test for FreeBSD 5.0 Cc: gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com, kettenis@chello.nl X-SW-Source: 2003-02/txt/msg00553.txt.bz2 mec> Is Fernando Nasser around? I haven't seen him in weeks. ac> You've not seen fernando for years! Yes, he is around. To be precise, the last e-mail I saw from Fernando N on gdb or gdb-patches was 2003-01-20. Mark K's patch is still waiting for approval, and I've got another patch which has been waiting for review for a week. I'm about to ping Fernando and the list about it. Michael C > Index: ChangeLog > from Mark Kettenis > > * gdb.base/attach.exp: When trying to attach to a nonexistent > process, make it possible to specify the PID based on the target.