From: Daniel Jacobowitz <drow@mvista.com>
To: David Carlton <carlton@math.stanford.edu>
Cc: Elena Zannoni <ezannoni@redhat.com>, gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com
Subject: Re: [rfa] more lookup_symbol_aux_minsyms futzing
Date: Thu, 20 Feb 2003 21:18:00 -0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20030220211642.GA24294@nevyn.them.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <ro11y22656m.fsf@jackfruit.Stanford.EDU>
On Thu, Feb 20, 2003 at 12:57:37PM -0800, David Carlton wrote:
> On Thu, 20 Feb 2003 15:08:19 -0500, Elena Zannoni <ezannoni@redhat.com> said:
>
> > A few comments
>
> Ack! I was considering this patch to be withdrawn, and I hadn't
> noticed that it got added to GNATS. Right now, all I'm proposing is
> the search_symbols part of this patch (with a comment added), as in PR
> symtab/1049. (Incidentally, I'm curious if Daniel considers the patch
> in symtab/1070 to still be active: if so, please review the e-mail
> discussion that Daniel and I had about this. I actually have more to
> say about that if you're considering approving that patch.)
Yes, I never withdrew it; that's why I forwarded it to GNATS.
> 1) A patch to correct a slight bug that remains in
> lookup_partial_symbol. Basically, partial symbols are sorted via
> strcmp but we want to use strcmp_iw as our matching criterion;
> strcmp and strcmp_iw aren't _quite_ suitable to be used together in
> this way.
Should they be sorted via strcmp_iw instead?
--
Daniel Jacobowitz
MontaVista Software Debian GNU/Linux Developer
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2003-02-20 21:18 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2002-12-23 10:56 David Carlton
2002-12-24 1:56 ` Jason Molenda
2002-12-24 10:05 ` David Carlton
2002-12-24 16:34 ` Jason Molenda
2003-02-20 20:04 ` Elena Zannoni
2003-02-20 20:57 ` David Carlton
2003-02-20 21:18 ` Daniel Jacobowitz [this message]
2003-02-20 21:35 ` David Carlton
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20030220211642.GA24294@nevyn.them.org \
--to=drow@mvista.com \
--cc=carlton@math.stanford.edu \
--cc=ezannoni@redhat.com \
--cc=gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox