From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 11539 invoked by alias); 20 Feb 2003 19:32:05 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sources.redhat.com Received: (qmail 1381 invoked from network); 20 Feb 2003 19:23:01 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO crack.them.org) (65.125.64.184) by 172.16.49.205 with SMTP; 20 Feb 2003 19:23:01 -0000 Received: from nevyn.them.org ([66.93.61.169] ident=mail) by crack.them.org with asmtp (Exim 3.12 #1 (Debian)) id 18lyAm-0001Sc-00; Thu, 20 Feb 2003 15:24:05 -0600 Received: from drow by nevyn.them.org with local (Exim 3.36 #1 (Debian)) id 18lwHZ-0004vC-00; Thu, 20 Feb 2003 14:22:57 -0500 Date: Thu, 20 Feb 2003 19:32:00 -0000 From: Daniel Jacobowitz To: Andrew Cagney Cc: GDB Patches Subject: Re: [patch/rfc] Add a sentinel frame Message-ID: <20030220192257.GB18821@nevyn.them.org> Mail-Followup-To: Andrew Cagney , GDB Patches References: <20030219165623.GA7961@nevyn.them.org> <3E53BBCB.2010003@redhat.com> <20030219171700.GA8736@nevyn.them.org> <3E53C416.30809@redhat.com> <20030219175654.GA10010@nevyn.them.org> <3E53CFB8.8070201@redhat.com> <20030219185202.GA11371@nevyn.them.org> <3E53E8B8.10203@redhat.com> <20030219203937.GA14890@nevyn.them.org> <3E53FC0E.50405@redhat.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <3E53FC0E.50405@redhat.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.1i X-SW-Source: 2003-02/txt/msg00489.txt.bz2 On Wed, Feb 19, 2003 at 04:50:06PM -0500, Andrew Cagney wrote: > Anyway, do you now see why trying to directly call frame_chain_valid() > wouldn't be helpful to the rewritten get_prev_frame? Yes, I think I do now. Thanks. -- Daniel Jacobowitz MontaVista Software Debian GNU/Linux Developer