From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 27535 invoked by alias); 20 Feb 2003 15:22:47 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sources.redhat.com Received: (qmail 27461 invoked from network); 20 Feb 2003 15:22:47 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO crack.them.org) (65.125.64.184) by 172.16.49.205 with SMTP; 20 Feb 2003 15:22:47 -0000 Received: from nevyn.them.org ([66.93.61.169] ident=mail) by crack.them.org with asmtp (Exim 3.12 #1 (Debian)) id 18luQI-0000nR-00; Thu, 20 Feb 2003 11:23:50 -0600 Received: from drow by nevyn.them.org with local (Exim 3.36 #1 (Debian)) id 18lsX5-0007d5-00; Thu, 20 Feb 2003 10:22:43 -0500 Date: Thu, 20 Feb 2003 15:22:00 -0000 From: Daniel Jacobowitz To: Alexandre Oliva Cc: gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org, binutils@sources.redhat.com, gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com Subject: Re: Unify --with-sysroot defaults Message-ID: <20030220152243.GB29197@nevyn.them.org> Mail-Followup-To: Alexandre Oliva , gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org, binutils@sources.redhat.com, gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com References: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.1i X-SW-Source: 2003-02/txt/msg00481.txt.bz2 On Thu, Feb 20, 2003 at 07:02:25AM -0300, Alexandre Oliva wrote: > Currently, GCC accepts --with-sysroot without an argument, whereas ld > and gdb don't. Also, GCC's default sysroot is not considered > relocatable, even though the whole point of picking that default was > such that it was. This patch arranges for all three tools to use the > same relocatable default. Ok to install in ld and gdb? (I'll install > it in gcc when I get approval for the others). Fine for GDB too. Should we be moving any of this logic to the top level? -- Daniel Jacobowitz MontaVista Software Debian GNU/Linux Developer