From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 4246 invoked by alias); 17 Feb 2003 18:16:00 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sources.redhat.com Received: (qmail 4227 invoked from network); 17 Feb 2003 18:16:00 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO delorie.com) (207.22.48.162) by 172.16.49.205 with SMTP; 17 Feb 2003 18:16:00 -0000 Received: from envy.delorie.com (envy.delorie.com [207.22.48.171]) by delorie.com (8.11.6/8.9.1) with ESMTP id h1HIFnH21018; Mon, 17 Feb 2003 13:15:49 -0500 Received: (from dj@localhost) by envy.delorie.com (8.11.6/8.11.2) id h1HIFmV17543; Mon, 17 Feb 2003 13:15:48 -0500 Date: Mon, 17 Feb 2003 18:16:00 -0000 Message-Id: <200302171815.h1HIFmV17543@envy.delorie.com> X-Authentication-Warning: envy.delorie.com: dj set sender to dj@delorie.com using -f From: DJ Delorie To: drow@mvista.com CC: ac131313@redhat.com, neroden@twcny.rr.com, geoffk@apple.com, gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com, binutils@sources.redhat.com In-reply-to: <20030217175009.GA20096@nevyn.them.org> (message from Daniel Jacobowitz on Mon, 17 Feb 2003 12:50:09 -0500) Subject: Re: [ob] Regenerate src/configure with 000227 References: <3E511936.7000106@redhat.com> <200302171746.h1HHkt317158@envy.delorie.com> <20030217175009.GA20096@nevyn.them.org> X-SW-Source: 2003-02/txt/msg00357.txt.bz2 > Binutils and GDB have "always" documented the use of a snapshot from > /pub/binutils on sourceware... Yes, I know. My policy is to use whatever version causes the smallest diff ;-) > Not that people consistently do it. Nor does the gcc group use it. In any event, I'm mosly asking to keep the two in sync, but it strikes me as odd that an "obvious" change changed the functionality of configure, not just the syntax error.