From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 895 invoked by alias); 14 Feb 2003 00:13:19 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sources.redhat.com Received: (qmail 888 invoked from network); 14 Feb 2003 00:13:18 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO crack.them.org) (65.125.64.184) by 172.16.49.205 with SMTP; 14 Feb 2003 00:13:18 -0000 Received: from nevyn.them.org ([66.93.61.169] ident=mail) by crack.them.org with asmtp (Exim 3.12 #1 (Debian)) id 18jVMp-0007PR-00; Thu, 13 Feb 2003 20:14:19 -0600 Received: from drow by nevyn.them.org with local (Exim 3.36 #1 (Debian)) id 18jTTg-0004qW-00; Thu, 13 Feb 2003 19:13:16 -0500 Date: Fri, 14 Feb 2003 00:13:00 -0000 From: Daniel Jacobowitz To: Kris Warkentin Cc: gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com Subject: Re: patch to add QNX NTO i386 support Message-ID: <20030214001316.GA18590@nevyn.them.org> Mail-Followup-To: Kris Warkentin , gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com References: <3E40387D.50001@redhat.com> <008f01c2ce4b$427295f0$2a00a8c0@dash> <86lm0r3nha.fsf@elgar.kettenis.dyndns.org> <01dd01c2d3aa$d4c1b1c0$0202040a@catdog> <20030213220751.GA15234@nevyn.them.org> <020c01c2d3ae$c7cb39b0$0202040a@catdog> <20030213222922.GA15783@nevyn.them.org> <000901c2d3ba$cb19aaf0$2a00a8c0@dash> <20030214000311.GA18154@nevyn.them.org> <003d01c2d3bd$b136bf30$2a00a8c0@dash> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <003d01c2d3bd$b136bf30$2a00a8c0@dash> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.1i X-SW-Source: 2003-02/txt/msg00324.txt.bz2 On Thu, Feb 13, 2003 at 07:11:58PM -0500, Kris Warkentin wrote: > > That said, I still think you should be using "file" above. File > > specifies the main program, and that's what it is. Then you can give > > whatever path you want to the stub. > > Once you say 'file /home/kewarken/foo', I don't believe there is any way to > tell it to run /tmp/foo. After I've said 'file', if I go 'run /tmp/foo' it > tries to run /home/kewarken/foo with /tmp/foo as an argument. Perhaps I'm > just missing something? Oh! I was misunderstanding - I've never seen that particular syntax for run before, and if you ask me, it should be killed ASAP. It's terribly confusing to ambiguously use the first argument as a program. Let me guess, it's the documented way to use GDB with target qnx? -- Daniel Jacobowitz MontaVista Software Debian GNU/Linux Developer