From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 25116 invoked by alias); 12 Feb 2003 18:42:46 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sources.redhat.com Received: (qmail 25109 invoked from network); 12 Feb 2003 18:42:45 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO crack.them.org) (65.125.64.184) by 172.16.49.205 with SMTP; 12 Feb 2003 18:42:45 -0000 Received: from nevyn.them.org ([66.93.61.169] ident=mail) by crack.them.org with asmtp (Exim 3.12 #1 (Debian)) id 18j3jD-0004H7-00; Wed, 12 Feb 2003 14:43:36 -0600 Received: from drow by nevyn.them.org with local (Exim 3.36 #1 (Debian)) id 18j1q4-00081m-00; Wed, 12 Feb 2003 13:42:32 -0500 Date: Wed, 12 Feb 2003 18:42:00 -0000 From: Daniel Jacobowitz To: David Carlton Cc: Andrew Cagney , gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com Subject: Re: [commit/obish] Fix cntrl-z Message-ID: <20030212184232.GA30842@nevyn.them.org> Mail-Followup-To: David Carlton , Andrew Cagney , gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com References: <3E4A69FC.8070605@redhat.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.1i X-SW-Source: 2003-02/txt/msg00289.txt.bz2 On Wed, Feb 12, 2003 at 09:35:17AM -0800, David Carlton wrote: > On Wed, 12 Feb 2003 16:36:28 +0100, Andrew Cagney said: > > > The attatched gets rid of the immediate problem of cntrl-z not > > working. When async, it calls cli_command_loop. Thanks to mark for > > analyzing the problem. > > This patch (or some other patch since yesterday and today) causes > gdb.c++/annota2.exp: annotate-quit (PR gdb/544) to start KFAILing > again for me. (It had been passing since the interpreter stuff > finished merging in a week or two ago.) > > An old, harmless bug is probably better than a new, more annoying bug, > but do you think there's any way to fix the cntrl-z issue while still > fixing gdb/544? Woah! Deterministic behavior on the annotate-quit test? It's probably something in the CLI command loop then... -- Daniel Jacobowitz MontaVista Software Debian GNU/Linux Developer