From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gdb-patches-return-22377-listarch-gdb-patches=sources.redhat.com@sources.redhat.com>
Received: (qmail 31560 invoked by alias); 7 Feb 2003 17:08:59 -0000
Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Subscribe: <mailto:gdb-patches-subscribe@sources.redhat.com>
List-Archive: <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/gdb-patches/>
List-Post: <mailto:gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com>
List-Help: <mailto:gdb-patches-help@sources.redhat.com>, <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/#faqs>
Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sources.redhat.com
Received: (qmail 31553 invoked from network); 7 Feb 2003 17:08:59 -0000
Received: from unknown (HELO duracef.shout.net) (204.253.184.12)
  by 172.16.49.205 with SMTP; 7 Feb 2003 17:08:59 -0000
Received: (from mec@localhost)
	by duracef.shout.net (8.11.6/8.11.6) id h17H8r215828;
	Fri, 7 Feb 2003 11:08:53 -0600
Date: Fri, 07 Feb 2003 17:08:00 -0000
From: Michael Elizabeth Chastain <mec@shout.net>
Message-Id: <200302071708.h17H8r215828@duracef.shout.net>
To: carlton@math.stanford.edu
Subject: Re: [patch] KFAIL gdb/1025
Cc: drow@mvista.com, gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com
X-SW-Source: 2003-02/txt/msg00235.txt.bz2

David C> I normally run it via 'make check', with no tinkering with the
David C> various files.

Then I wonder how you are getting stabs+ with gcc 3.1.

Actually, I'm a bit confused.  Are you actually seeing these specific
'description field too big' messages in your gdb.log?

Michael C