From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 29723 invoked by alias); 7 Feb 2003 16:16:42 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sources.redhat.com Received: (qmail 29702 invoked from network); 7 Feb 2003 16:16:41 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO duracef.shout.net) (204.253.184.12) by 172.16.49.205 with SMTP; 7 Feb 2003 16:16:41 -0000 Received: (from mec@localhost) by duracef.shout.net (8.11.6/8.11.6) id h17GGad15121; Fri, 7 Feb 2003 10:16:36 -0600 Date: Fri, 07 Feb 2003 16:16:00 -0000 From: Michael Elizabeth Chastain Message-Id: <200302071616.h17GGad15121@duracef.shout.net> To: carlton@math.stanford.edu, drow@mvista.com Subject: Re: [patch] KFAIL gdb/1025 Cc: gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com X-SW-Source: 2003-02/txt/msg00233.txt.bz2 Weird, my notes say that gcc 3.0.4 had this problem but that gcc 3.1 and later did not. But I am definitely not seeing any 'description field too big' messages with my test bed, and that includes gcc 3.2.1, gcc 3.2.2-20030203, and gcc-3_2-branch, with binutils 2.13.2.1 and -gstabs+. Aha. My test bed runs with: runtest ... --target-board unix/gdb:debug_flags=-gstabs+ But the gcj command is not getting invoked with -gstabs+. So I am always testing gcj with the default debug format, which explains my results. Argh. Yet another dejagnu mystery to look into. David, how do you run the test suite? Michael C