From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 23114 invoked by alias); 6 Feb 2003 23:36:03 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sources.redhat.com Received: (qmail 23092 invoked from network); 6 Feb 2003 23:36:02 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO redhat.com) (66.30.22.225) by 172.16.49.205 with SMTP; 6 Feb 2003 23:36:02 -0000 Received: by redhat.com (Postfix, from userid 201) id 76F281B8E7; Thu, 6 Feb 2003 18:36:54 -0500 (EST) Date: Thu, 06 Feb 2003 23:36:00 -0000 From: Christopher Faylor To: gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com Subject: Re: [RFA] DLLs without debugging symbols (repost) Message-ID: <20030206233654.GA12906@redhat.com> Mail-Followup-To: gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com References: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.1i X-SW-Source: 2003-02/txt/msg00226.txt.bz2 I don't believe that I have the right to check this in, unfortunately. I'm just mentioning this in case someone was waiting for me to do something... cgf On Thu, Feb 06, 2003 at 10:56:37PM -0000, Raoul Gough wrote: >Apparently my copyright assignment forms have now been processed, so my >patches for extracting minimal symbols from DLLs could now be entered >into CVS. This message includes up-to-date diffs with the latest >versions of the relevant files, as well as some documentation that I've >added to gdb.texinfo (basically, there's a new node under the Cygwin >Native node entitled "Non-debug DLL symbols" which explains some of the >tricks involved).