From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gdb-patches-return-22354-listarch-gdb-patches=sources.redhat.com@sources.redhat.com>
Received: (qmail 4787 invoked by alias); 6 Feb 2003 06:31:35 -0000
Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Subscribe: <mailto:gdb-patches-subscribe@sources.redhat.com>
List-Archive: <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/gdb-patches/>
List-Post: <mailto:gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com>
List-Help: <mailto:gdb-patches-help@sources.redhat.com>, <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/#faqs>
Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sources.redhat.com
Received: (qmail 4777 invoked from network); 6 Feb 2003 06:31:35 -0000
Received: from unknown (HELO molenda.com) (192.220.74.81)
  by 172.16.49.205 with SMTP; 6 Feb 2003 06:31:35 -0000
Received: (qmail 1714 invoked by uid 19025); 6 Feb 2003 06:31:34 -0000
Date: Thu, 06 Feb 2003 06:31:00 -0000
From: Jason Molenda <jason-swarelist@molenda.com>
To: Elena Zannoni <ezannoni@redhat.com>
Cc: Daniel Jacobowitz <drow@mvista.com>,
  David Carlton <carlton@math.stanford.edu>,
  Andrew Cagney <ac131313@redhat.com>, gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com,
  jjohnstn@redhat.com
Subject: Re: Fix committed for mi-syn-frames fails (was: Re: PATCH RFA: Fix MI stack frame output for synthetic frames)
Message-ID: <20030205223134.A1503@molenda.com>
References: <20021109004723.A20334@molenda.com> <3E3CB218.1020706@redhat.com> <ro17kchb58n.fsf@jackfruit.Stanford.EDU> <20030203102748.A75701@molenda.com> <20030203183441.GA27429@nevyn.them.org> <20030204000936.A19984@molenda.com> <20030205002416.A75501@molenda.com> <20030205135947.GA30516@nevyn.them.org> <15937.9876.260141.789359@localhost.redhat.com> <20030205222835.A985@molenda.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
User-Agent: Mutt/1.2.5.1i
In-Reply-To: <20030205222835.A985@molenda.com>; from jason-swarelist@molenda.com on Wed, Feb 05, 2003 at 10:28:35PM -0800
X-SW-Source: 2003-02/txt/msg00212.txt.bz2

(Yes yes, I fixed the ChangeLog -- deep in my heart I know this file
should be called "mi-syn-frames", not "mi-syn-frame". :-)

On Wed, Feb 05, 2003 at 10:28:35PM -0800, Jason Molenda wrote:
> I've commited this.  mi-syn-frames.exp passes with gcc 3.2 and
> gcc 2.96 with stabs and DWARF 2.
> 
> 
> 2003-02-05  Jason Molenda  (jason-cl@molenda.com)
> 
> 	* gdb.mi/mi-syn-frames.c (subroutine): Add an extra statement
> 	at the beginning so the breakpoint doesn't get set on the loop.
> 
> Index: gdb.mi/mi-syn-frame.c
> ===================================================================
> RCS file: /cvs/src/src/gdb/testsuite/gdb.mi/mi-syn-frame.c,v
> retrieving revision 1.1
> diff -u -p -r1.1 mi-syn-frame.c
> --- gdb.mi/mi-syn-frame.c	2 Feb 2003 05:51:09 -0000	1.1
> +++ gdb.mi/mi-syn-frame.c	6 Feb 2003 06:26:01 -0000
> @@ -46,8 +46,9 @@ handler (int sig)
>  void
>  subroutine (int in)
>  {
> -  while (in < 100)
> -    in++;
> +  int count = in;
> +  while (count < 100)
> +    count++;
>  }
>  
>  void