From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gdb-patches-return-22334-listarch-gdb-patches=sources.redhat.com@sources.redhat.com>
Received: (qmail 21087 invoked by alias); 5 Feb 2003 17:37:48 -0000
Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Subscribe: <mailto:gdb-patches-subscribe@sources.redhat.com>
List-Archive: <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/gdb-patches/>
List-Post: <mailto:gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com>
List-Help: <mailto:gdb-patches-help@sources.redhat.com>, <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/#faqs>
Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sources.redhat.com
Received: (qmail 21067 invoked from network); 5 Feb 2003 17:37:48 -0000
Received: from unknown (HELO duracef.shout.net) (204.253.184.12)
  by 172.16.49.205 with SMTP; 5 Feb 2003 17:37:48 -0000
Received: (from mec@localhost)
	by duracef.shout.net (8.11.6/8.11.6) id h15HbkE06439;
	Wed, 5 Feb 2003 11:37:46 -0600
Date: Wed, 05 Feb 2003 17:37:00 -0000
From: Michael Elizabeth Chastain <mec@shout.net>
Message-Id: <200302051737.h15HbkE06439@duracef.shout.net>
To: ac131313@redhat.com
Subject: Re: [rfa] PROBLEMS: i[3456]*-linux-*: warn about old binutils
Cc: gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com
X-SW-Source: 2003-02/txt/msg00192.txt.bz2

Andrew C says:

> Yea, just suggest citing a bug report describing the symptoms.
> (hey you get to use the external category :-).

Sounds good to me.  I can propagate my list of the tests that regress
from my personal files into the PR database.

I can close the PR, too, because it's fixed in current binutils.

Michael C