From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gdb-patches-return-22314-listarch-gdb-patches=sources.redhat.com@sources.redhat.com>
Received: (qmail 6805 invoked by alias); 5 Feb 2003 06:04:08 -0000
Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Subscribe: <mailto:gdb-patches-subscribe@sources.redhat.com>
List-Archive: <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/gdb-patches/>
List-Post: <mailto:gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com>
List-Help: <mailto:gdb-patches-help@sources.redhat.com>, <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/#faqs>
Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sources.redhat.com
Received: (qmail 6798 invoked from network); 5 Feb 2003 06:04:07 -0000
Received: from unknown (HELO duracef.shout.net) (204.253.184.12)
  by 172.16.49.205 with SMTP; 5 Feb 2003 06:04:07 -0000
Received: (from mec@localhost)
	by duracef.shout.net (8.11.6/8.11.6) id h15645A30107;
	Wed, 5 Feb 2003 00:04:05 -0600
Date: Wed, 05 Feb 2003 06:04:00 -0000
From: Michael Elizabeth Chastain <mec@shout.net>
Message-Id: <200302050604.h15645A30107@duracef.shout.net>
To: carlton@math.stanford.edu, drow@mvista.com
Subject: Re: [patch] KFAIL gdb/1025
Cc: gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com
X-SW-Source: 2003-02/txt/msg00172.txt.bz2

What error messages are you getting in gdb.java?

I've been getting some too.  This is a new issue.

> So I'm leaving the PR open for now; if we ever figure out what's up with
> that, we can close the PR and/or XFAIL the tests, as appropriate.

Sounds good.  I think we have this issue under control.

Michael C