From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gdb-patches-return-22275-listarch-gdb-patches=sources.redhat.com@sources.redhat.com>
Received: (qmail 3334 invoked by alias); 4 Feb 2003 20:07:33 -0000
Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Subscribe: <mailto:gdb-patches-subscribe@sources.redhat.com>
List-Archive: <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/gdb-patches/>
List-Post: <mailto:gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com>
List-Help: <mailto:gdb-patches-help@sources.redhat.com>, <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/#faqs>
Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sources.redhat.com
Received: (qmail 3321 invoked from network); 4 Feb 2003 20:07:32 -0000
Received: from unknown (HELO duracef.shout.net) (204.253.184.12)
  by 172.16.49.205 with SMTP; 4 Feb 2003 20:07:32 -0000
Received: (from mec@localhost)
	by duracef.shout.net (8.11.6/8.11.6) id h14K7P621350;
	Tue, 4 Feb 2003 14:07:25 -0600
Date: Tue, 04 Feb 2003 20:07:00 -0000
From: Michael Elizabeth Chastain <mec@shout.net>
Message-Id: <200302042007.h14K7P621350@duracef.shout.net>
To: drow@mvista.com, gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com
Subject: Re: [patch] KFAIL gdb/1025
Cc: carlton@math.stanford.edu
X-SW-Source: 2003-02/txt/msg00133.txt.bz2

Daniel J writes:
> Oh, blah, my apologies.  overload.exp has tests with almost the same
> names.  If you could send me a compiled binary which does show the
> problem I'd appreciate that.  Attach it to the PR maybe.

I tossed up an attachment with a source file, .s file, .exe file,
and a typescript of a gdb session.

Michael C