From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 954 invoked by alias); 4 Feb 2003 18:21:59 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sources.redhat.com Received: (qmail 942 invoked from network); 4 Feb 2003 18:21:59 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO crack.them.org) (65.125.64.184) by 172.16.49.205 with SMTP; 4 Feb 2003 18:21:59 -0000 Received: from nevyn.them.org ([66.93.61.169] ident=mail) by crack.them.org with asmtp (Exim 3.12 #1 (Debian)) id 18g9ao-00009Z-00 for ; Tue, 04 Feb 2003 14:22:54 -0600 Received: from drow by nevyn.them.org with local (Exim 3.36 #1 (Debian)) id 18g7hn-00069O-00 for ; Tue, 04 Feb 2003 13:21:59 -0500 Date: Tue, 04 Feb 2003 18:21:00 -0000 From: Daniel Jacobowitz To: gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com Subject: Re: RFC: PowerPC/Linux signal handlers Message-ID: <20030204182159.GA22089@nevyn.them.org> Mail-Followup-To: gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com References: <20030117151249.GA27317@nevyn.them.org> <1030117165530.ZM29286@localhost.localdomain> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <1030117165530.ZM29286@localhost.localdomain> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.1i X-SW-Source: 2003-02/txt/msg00126.txt.bz2 On Fri, Jan 17, 2003 at 09:55:31AM -0700, Kevin Buettner wrote: > On Jan 17, 10:12am, Daniel Jacobowitz wrote: > > > Kevin, any comments on this patch? > > It's fine with me so long as the new function is indented to adhere to > GNU coding standards. > > > [From a copyright perspective I think it's OK; this is an obvious patch > > once someone tells us that the used syscall numbers have changed. > > Anyone have a different opinion?] > > I agree, but wait a few days for dissenting opinions. I've checked this in. -- Daniel Jacobowitz MontaVista Software Debian GNU/Linux Developer