From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gdb-patches-return-22235-listarch-gdb-patches=sources.redhat.com@sources.redhat.com>
Received: (qmail 28704 invoked by alias); 3 Feb 2003 21:21:20 -0000
Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Subscribe: <mailto:gdb-patches-subscribe@sources.redhat.com>
List-Archive: <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/gdb-patches/>
List-Post: <mailto:gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com>
List-Help: <mailto:gdb-patches-help@sources.redhat.com>, <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/#faqs>
Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sources.redhat.com
Received: (qmail 28697 invoked from network); 3 Feb 2003 21:21:20 -0000
Received: from unknown (HELO duracef.shout.net) (204.253.184.12)
  by 172.16.49.205 with SMTP; 3 Feb 2003 21:21:20 -0000
Received: (from mec@localhost)
	by duracef.shout.net (8.11.6/8.11.6) id h13LL2R32056;
	Mon, 3 Feb 2003 15:21:02 -0600
Date: Mon, 03 Feb 2003 21:21:00 -0000
From: Michael Elizabeth Chastain <mec@shout.net>
Message-Id: <200302032121.h13LL2R32056@duracef.shout.net>
To: carlton@math.stanford.edu
Subject: Re: [rfa/doc] correct info about best C++ compilers/debug formats
Cc: drow@mvista.com, eliz@gnu.org, gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com
X-SW-Source: 2003-02/txt/msg00093.txt.bz2

It's beautiful.  I tested it, too: I built gdb and 'makeinfo' worked fine.

Recommended for approval.

Michael C

===

2003-02-03  David Carlton  <carlton@math.stanford.edu>

	* gdb.texinfo (C@t{++}): Recommend DWARF2, then stabs+.
	(Variables): Recommend stabs+ and DWARF2.
	(C plus plus expressions): Correct info about
	compiler versions, debug formats.
	PR symtab/874.