From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gdb-patches-return-22219-listarch-gdb-patches=sources.redhat.com@sources.redhat.com>
Received: (qmail 15104 invoked by alias); 3 Feb 2003 18:57:54 -0000
Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Subscribe: <mailto:gdb-patches-subscribe@sources.redhat.com>
List-Archive: <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/gdb-patches/>
List-Post: <mailto:gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com>
List-Help: <mailto:gdb-patches-help@sources.redhat.com>, <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/#faqs>
Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sources.redhat.com
Received: (qmail 14896 invoked from network); 3 Feb 2003 18:57:54 -0000
Received: from unknown (HELO duracef.shout.net) (204.253.184.12)
  by 172.16.49.205 with SMTP; 3 Feb 2003 18:57:54 -0000
Received: (from mec@localhost)
	by duracef.shout.net (8.11.6/8.11.6) id h13Ivnr29148;
	Mon, 3 Feb 2003 12:57:49 -0600
Date: Mon, 03 Feb 2003 18:57:00 -0000
From: Michael Elizabeth Chastain <mec@shout.net>
Message-Id: <200302031857.h13Ivnr29148@duracef.shout.net>
To: drow@mvista.com, gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com
Subject: Re: [patch] gdb.c++/pr-1023.exp: new test script
X-SW-Source: 2003-02/txt/msg00077.txt.bz2

drow> You should be using either setup_kfail or an explicit kfail, but not
drow> both.  I think you meant the latter in this case.

Nice eyes!  You are right.

Michael C