From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 11138 invoked by alias); 1 Feb 2003 17:47:44 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sources.redhat.com Received: (qmail 11114 invoked from network); 1 Feb 2003 17:47:43 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO duracef.shout.net) (204.253.184.12) by 172.16.49.205 with SMTP; 1 Feb 2003 17:47:43 -0000 Received: (from mec@localhost) by duracef.shout.net (8.11.6/8.11.6) id h11HlhF21271; Sat, 1 Feb 2003 11:47:43 -0600 Date: Sat, 01 Feb 2003 17:47:00 -0000 From: Michael Elizabeth Chastain Message-Id: <200302011747.h11HlhF21271@duracef.shout.net> To: gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com, kettenis@chello.nl Subject: Re: [PATCH] Testsuite: deal gracefully with lack of pthreads X-SW-Source: 2003-02/txt/msg00029.txt.bz2 Mark K asks: > There's probably one issue: We have a ChangeLog in both testsuite and > testsuite/gdb.mi. Both seem to be in used for MI tests. Which one is > preferred, and can we think of a way to avoid that both are used? This issue has come up before. Since there haven't been any entries to gdb.mi/ChangeLog in 2003, I propose a bit of a kludge: split testsuite/gdb.mi/ChangeLog to gdb.mi/ChangeLog.{1999,2000,2001,2002} cvs remove testsuite/gdb.mi/ChangeLog use testsuite/ChangeLog now and in the future My two cents, Michael C