From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 5404 invoked by alias); 30 Jan 2003 01:52:38 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sources.redhat.com Received: (qmail 5397 invoked from network); 30 Jan 2003 01:52:37 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO crack.them.org) (65.125.64.184) by 172.16.49.205 with SMTP; 30 Jan 2003 01:52:37 -0000 Received: from nevyn.them.org ([66.93.61.169] ident=mail) by crack.them.org with asmtp (Exim 3.12 #1 (Debian)) id 18e5lY-0001L3-00 for ; Wed, 29 Jan 2003 21:53:28 -0600 Received: from drow by nevyn.them.org with local (Exim 3.36 #1 (Debian)) id 18e3t7-00067n-00 for ; Wed, 29 Jan 2003 20:53:09 -0500 Date: Thu, 30 Jan 2003 01:52:00 -0000 From: Daniel Jacobowitz To: gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com Subject: Re: [RFC] Partial support for dwarf3 DW_AT_ranges Message-ID: <20030130015309.GA23508@nevyn.them.org> Mail-Followup-To: gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com References: <20011231003448.A3399@redhat.com> <15413.57239.249007.204757@localhost.localdomain> <20030129155346.GA13172@nevyn.them.org> <15928.6608.942581.500183@localhost.redhat.com> <20030130005208.GA28894@nevyn.them.org> <15928.31398.39881.249991@localhost.redhat.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <15928.31398.39881.249991@localhost.redhat.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.1i X-SW-Source: 2003-01/txt/msg00803.txt.bz2 On Wed, Jan 29, 2003 at 08:06:45PM -0500, Elena Zannoni wrote: > Daniel Jacobowitz writes: > > On Wed, Jan 29, 2003 at 01:13:36PM -0500, Elena Zannoni wrote: > > > If you have time, I'd appreciate it. I have adapted the patch to the > > > current sources, but even with it, I wasn't able to make Jakub's > > > example work. The example is in PR 833. > > > I can send you the diffs I have, if it helps. > > > > This is pretty similar to what you sent me, cleaned up a little to > > match my reading of the standard. It works to fix my testcase for PR > > gdb/961, which is a simpler case of disappearing local variables. > > I'll submit that for the testsuite separately but I don't know quite > > how to do it yet; the problem is not going to show up if you don't have > > optimization. > > > > cool! i think there is a testcase in gdb.base somewhere that turns > optimization up to -O2, so you could copy that (mips-pro.exp and > break.exp), if this is what you are asking. > > > This doesn't solve PR gdb/833, for the reasons outlined in my previous > > message. > > > > How does this patch look? > > > > ok with me. > > thanks!! It's checked in. Onwards - I may try to dig up my notes from the last discussion about discontiguous address ranges, if I have time. -- Daniel Jacobowitz MontaVista Software Debian GNU/Linux Developer