From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 12888 invoked by alias); 27 Jan 2003 14:56:42 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sources.redhat.com Received: (qmail 12861 invoked from network); 27 Jan 2003 14:56:41 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO disaster.jaj.com) (66.93.21.106) by 172.16.49.205 with SMTP; 27 Jan 2003 14:56:41 -0000 Received: (from phil@localhost) by disaster.jaj.com (8.11.4/8.11.4) id h0REuTC31228; Mon, 27 Jan 2003 09:56:29 -0500 Date: Mon, 27 Jan 2003 14:56:00 -0000 From: Phil Edwards To: Alexandre Oliva Cc: Nathanael Nerode , gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org, gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com, binutils@sources.redhat.com Subject: Re: (toplevel patch) Use canonical names for target_subdir, build_subdir. Message-ID: <20030127145629.GA31107@disaster.jaj.com> References: <20030124034053.GA22615@doctormoo> <20030126122246.GA7985@disaster.jaj.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.3i X-SW-Source: 2003-01/txt/msg00730.txt.bz2 On Sun, Jan 26, 2003 at 10:44:56AM -0200, Alexandre Oliva wrote: > On Jan 26, 2003, Phil Edwards wrote: > > > On Fri, Jan 24, 2003 at 02:50:21PM -0200, Alexandre Oliva wrote: > >> On Jan 24, 2003, Nathanael Nerode wrote: > >> > >> > Use the canonical build and target names for build_subdir and target_subdir. > >> > >> Not ok. athlon-linux-gnu is canonicalized to i686-linux-gnu, so we > >> can't use the same directories for both of them. (Consider building a > >> compiler on athlon that must run on i686, or on the other way round). > > > So, is this going to be reverted or not? It's destroying the testsuite > > results. > > Please go ahead and revert it. It must have gone in by mistake, since > it was explicitly rejected. Done as below. Looking over the cvs log, I think Nathanael might have been committed this by accident as part of reverting his rda stuff. That would explain why it was committed at the top level and not in the gcc directory. 2003-01-27 Phil Edwards * configure.in: Revert 24Jan change. * configure: Regenerate. Index: configure.in =================================================================== RCS file: /cvs/gcc/gcc/configure.in,v retrieving revision 1.217 diff -u -3 -p -r1.217 configure.in --- configure.in 24 Jan 2003 00:39:39 -0000 1.217 +++ configure.in 27 Jan 2003 14:53:33 -0000 @@ -201,7 +201,7 @@ fi # We always want to use the same name for this directory, so that dejagnu # can reliably find it. -target_subdir=${target} +target_subdir=${target_alias} if test ! -d ${target_subdir} ; then if mkdir ${target_subdir} ; then true @@ -211,7 +211,8 @@ if test ! -d ${target_subdir} ; then fi fi -build_subdir=build-${build} +build_prefix=build- +build_subdir=${build_prefix}${build_alias} if test x"${build_alias}" != x"${host}" ; then if test ! -d ${build_subdir} ; then