From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 28569 invoked by alias); 24 Jan 2003 02:08:23 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sources.redhat.com Received: (qmail 28543 invoked from network); 24 Jan 2003 02:08:15 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO crack.them.org) (65.125.64.184) by 172.16.49.205 with SMTP; 24 Jan 2003 02:08:15 -0000 Received: from nevyn.them.org ([66.93.61.169] ident=mail) by crack.them.org with asmtp (Exim 3.12 #1 (Debian)) id 18bv9L-0000eE-00; Thu, 23 Jan 2003 22:09:03 -0600 Received: from drow by nevyn.them.org with local (Exim 3.36 #1 (Debian)) id 18btGj-0006aZ-00; Thu, 23 Jan 2003 21:08:33 -0500 Date: Fri, 24 Jan 2003 02:08:00 -0000 From: Daniel Jacobowitz To: gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com, binutils@sources.redhat.com, gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org Subject: Re: (committed toplevel patch) Make rda native-only Message-ID: <20030124020833.GA25237@nevyn.them.org> Mail-Followup-To: gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com, binutils@sources.redhat.com, gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org References: <20030123220359.GA4257@doctormoo> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.1i X-SW-Source: 2003-01/txt/msg00711.txt.bz2 On Thu, Jan 23, 2003 at 09:37:25PM -0200, Alexandre Oliva wrote: > On Jan 23, 2003, Nathanael Nerode wrote: > > > i386-cygwin > > powerpc-eabi > > powerpc-linux > > > Need I go on? > > Yes, please. You forgot to explain what kind of error you're running > into. I've been building rda in a cross build environment pretty much > daily. If I may hazard a guess, you're building cross compilers using a sysroot or some other mechanism by which you've got target libc available. Does newlib provide enough for RDA? And if you build a powerpc-linux cross compiler, there's nothing to say you always have a libc to link to. RDA is the only thing I see in the target_modules list which is present in either src or gcc, and is not a library. -- Daniel Jacobowitz MontaVista Software Debian GNU/Linux Developer