From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gdb-patches-return-21939-listarch-gdb-patches=sources.redhat.com@sources.redhat.com>
Received: (qmail 15730 invoked by alias); 17 Jan 2003 19:32:16 -0000
Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Subscribe: <mailto:gdb-patches-subscribe@sources.redhat.com>
List-Archive: <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/gdb-patches/>
List-Post: <mailto:gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com>
List-Help: <mailto:gdb-patches-help@sources.redhat.com>, <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/#faqs>
Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sources.redhat.com
Received: (qmail 15690 invoked from network); 17 Jan 2003 19:32:14 -0000
Received: from unknown (HELO duracef.shout.net) (204.253.184.12)
  by sources.redhat.com with SMTP; 17 Jan 2003 19:32:14 -0000
Received: (from mec@localhost)
	by duracef.shout.net (8.11.6/8.11.6) id h0HJWB105408;
	Fri, 17 Jan 2003 13:32:11 -0600
Date: Fri, 17 Jan 2003 19:32:00 -0000
From: Michael Elizabeth Chastain <mec@shout.net>
Message-Id: <200301171932.h0HJWB105408@duracef.shout.net>
To: ac131313@redhat.com
Subject: Re: [patch/rfc] Remove all setup_xfail's from testsuite/gdb.mi/
Cc: drow@mvista.com, fnasser@redhat.com, gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com
X-SW-Source: 2003-01/txt/msg00654.txt.bz2

Andrew C writes:

> See: http://sources.redhat.com/ml/gdb/2003-01/msg00296.html

Ah, okay, I misunderstood.  Now I understand that you are talking
about 's/CLLbsNNNNN//', not 'g/CLLbsNNNNN/d'.

I still think that's not useful in light of the progress we are
making but I would not be opposed to it happening.

Michael C