From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 11959 invoked by alias); 17 Jan 2003 19:28:14 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sources.redhat.com Received: (qmail 11932 invoked from network); 17 Jan 2003 19:28:12 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO duracef.shout.net) (204.253.184.12) by sources.redhat.com with SMTP; 17 Jan 2003 19:28:12 -0000 Received: (from mec@localhost) by duracef.shout.net (8.11.6/8.11.6) id h0HJS8805276; Fri, 17 Jan 2003 13:28:08 -0600 Date: Fri, 17 Jan 2003 19:28:00 -0000 From: Michael Elizabeth Chastain Message-Id: <200301171928.h0HJS8805276@duracef.shout.net> To: carlton@math.stanford.edu Subject: Re: [patch/rfc] Remove all setup_xfail's from testsuite/gdb.mi/ Cc: ac131313@redhat.com, drow@mvista.com, fnasser@redhat.com, gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com X-SW-Source: 2003-01/txt/msg00651.txt.bz2 David C writes: > I've noticed that there are an awful lot of DWARF 1 ones, which I > assume actually are legit. Here is what I want to do about gdb DWARF-1 C++ support: make a policy decision whether gdb supports DWARF-1 with C++ if yes: remove all the setup_xfail_format DWARF-1 calls add regular DWARF-1 testing file about 50 new PR's for all the new FAIL's file PR's against gcc for the external bugs (and they will hate us) if no: document that gdb supports C++ with DWARF-2 or stabs+ but not DWARF-1 add a DWARF-1 check to "skip_cplus_tests" remove all the setup_xfail_format DWARF-1 calls Michael C