From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gdb-patches-return-21904-listarch-gdb-patches=sources.redhat.com@sources.redhat.com>
Received: (qmail 13088 invoked by alias); 16 Jan 2003 18:07:52 -0000
Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Subscribe: <mailto:gdb-patches-subscribe@sources.redhat.com>
List-Archive: <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/gdb-patches/>
List-Post: <mailto:gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com>
List-Help: <mailto:gdb-patches-help@sources.redhat.com>, <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/#faqs>
Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sources.redhat.com
Received: (qmail 13080 invoked from network); 16 Jan 2003 18:07:44 -0000
Received: from unknown (HELO duracef.shout.net) (204.253.184.12)
  by sources.redhat.com with SMTP; 16 Jan 2003 18:07:44 -0000
Received: (from mec@localhost)
	by duracef.shout.net (8.11.6/8.11.6) id h0GI7bU16336;
	Thu, 16 Jan 2003 12:07:37 -0600
Date: Thu, 16 Jan 2003 18:07:00 -0000
From: Michael Elizabeth Chastain <mec@shout.net>
Message-Id: <200301161807.h0GI7bU16336@duracef.shout.net>
To: ezannoni@redhat.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Make tests more flexible
Cc: carlton@math.stanford.edu, gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com
X-SW-Source: 2003-01/txt/msg00619.txt.bz2

I read the tests and I think that the tests are written correctly.
So I think that either gcc is wrong, or gdb is wrong.

Michael C