From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 30282 invoked by alias); 16 Jan 2003 17:07:10 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sources.redhat.com Received: (qmail 29942 invoked from network); 16 Jan 2003 17:06:29 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO duracef.shout.net) (204.253.184.12) by sources.redhat.com with SMTP; 16 Jan 2003 17:06:29 -0000 Received: (from mec@localhost) by duracef.shout.net (8.11.6/8.11.6) id h0GH6Ex15353; Thu, 16 Jan 2003 11:06:14 -0600 Date: Thu, 16 Jan 2003 17:07:00 -0000 From: Michael Elizabeth Chastain Message-Id: <200301161706.h0GH6Ex15353@duracef.shout.net> To: fnasser@redhat.com Subject: Re: [patch/rfc] Remove all setup_xfail's from testsuite/gdb.mi/ Cc: ac131313@redhat.com, gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com X-SW-Source: 2003-01/txt/msg00610.txt.bz2 Fernando writes: > That is a true XFAIL, but it should be conditional to version 2 compilers > and stabs, so that it does not show as XPASS everywhere else. (regarding constvars.exp) I agree. In fact the mechanics are really easy, I think it's a 1-line patch. 'gcc_info' contains more information than we thought, it is not just a boolean, it's an integer with the gcc major version number. > Please see my reply to Daniel's message. Okay I'll take my thoughts over there. Michael C