From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 13578 invoked by alias); 16 Jan 2003 10:40:40 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sources.redhat.com Received: (qmail 13565 invoked from network); 16 Jan 2003 10:40:36 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO d9000.firstnet.net.uk) (212.103.224.244) by sources.redhat.com with SMTP; 16 Jan 2003 10:40:36 -0000 Received: (qmail 8638 invoked from network); 16 Jan 2003 10:43:03 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO scgj.streamline) (212.103.239.121) by 0 with SMTP; 16 Jan 2003 10:43:03 -0000 Received: from elmo.streamline (scpe.streamline [192.168.1.66]) by scgj.streamline (8.9.3/8.6.9) with ESMTP id KAA13199 for ; Thu, 16 Jan 2003 10:40:32 GMT Received: (from david@localhost) by elmo.streamline (8.11.6/8.11.6) id h0GAeSI19641 for gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com; Thu, 16 Jan 2003 10:40:28 GMT Date: Thu, 16 Jan 2003 10:40:00 -0000 From: David Lecomber To: gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com Subject: Re: Fortran: Intel vs G77 Message-ID: <20030116104028.A19544@streamline-computing.com> References: <20030115215104.A17981@streamline-computing.com> <20030115220843.GA12316@nevyn.them.org> <20030115232223.A18112@streamline-computing.com> <20030116044058.GA17068@nevyn.them.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.2.5.1i In-Reply-To: <20030116044058.GA17068@nevyn.them.org>; from drow@mvista.com on Wed, Jan 15, 2003 at 11:40:58PM -0500 X-SW-Source: 2003-01/txt/msg00596.txt.bz2 On Wed, Jan 15, 2003 at 11:40:58PM -0500, Daniel Jacobowitz wrote: >On Wed, Jan 15, 2003 at 11:22:23PM +0000, David Lecomber wrote: >> >> g77 2.96 (on redhat-7.3) -- symptom also appears in the g77 of >> redhat-6.2 but I don't have the version to hand -- and Intel Fortran >> Compiler v6.0. >> >> The debug info was the default from the -g option. I've now also just >> run g77 with -gdwarf and the same problem arises.. > >Could you try a recent (i.e. 3.2 or 3.2.1) version of g77? Those are >pretty old. Using 3.2.1 we get the same result.. Cheers David