From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 24243 invoked by alias); 15 Jan 2003 08:22:17 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sources.redhat.com Received: (qmail 23950 invoked from network); 15 Jan 2003 08:22:13 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO www.lampret.com) (193.189.173.98) by 209.249.29.67 with SMTP; 15 Jan 2003 08:22:13 -0000 Received: from vili ([212.118.94.130]) by www.lampret.com (8.11.6/8.11.6) with ESMTP id h0FBAHB20655; Wed, 15 Jan 2003 10:10:17 -0100 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" From: Marko Mlinar To: Andrew Cagney Subject: Re: OC? Date: Wed, 15 Jan 2003 08:22:00 -0000 User-Agent: KMail/1.4.1 Cc: gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com References: <3DF6642E.7020700@redhat.com> <200212110807.45649.markom@opencores.org> <3E243623.9000700@redhat.com> In-Reply-To: <3E243623.9000700@redhat.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Message-Id: <200301150929.15118.markom@opencores.org> X-SW-Source: 2003-01/txt/msg00552.txt.bz2 Hi Andrew! > Turns out this has been done. > > > We have also problems with registers. You were saying something that we > > should move all the registers (we have 8k+ registers with generated > > names) into the temporary storage (I hope all these won't get cached in > > the host...). > > Yes. A gui for instance will likely want access to all names at once. I tried to fix this issue, but there were not enough documentation nor such= =20 targets for me to dig through. Is it possible that you (or somebody else)=20 change this please? We already have register name generators and all such stuff, it would only= =20 need connections to gdb routines. thanks, Marko