From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 22721 invoked by alias); 14 Jan 2003 05:54:53 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sources.redhat.com Received: (qmail 22714 invoked from network); 14 Jan 2003 05:54:53 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO crack.them.org) (65.125.64.184) by 209.249.29.67 with SMTP; 14 Jan 2003 05:54:53 -0000 Received: from nevyn.them.org ([66.93.61.169] ident=mail) by crack.them.org with asmtp (Exim 3.12 #1 (Debian)) id 18YLut-0007s9-00 for ; Tue, 14 Jan 2003 01:55:23 -0600 Received: from drow by nevyn.them.org with local (Exim 3.36 #1 (Debian)) id 18YK2d-0002tR-00 for ; Tue, 14 Jan 2003 00:55:15 -0500 Date: Tue, 14 Jan 2003 05:54:00 -0000 From: Daniel Jacobowitz To: gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com Subject: Re: [RFC/testsuite] Update "info float" output for i386 Message-ID: <20030114055514.GA11105@nevyn.them.org> Mail-Followup-To: gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com References: <20030114041526.GA1885@nevyn.them.org> <3E23A587.10009@redhat.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <3E23A587.10009@redhat.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.1i X-SW-Source: 2003-01/txt/msg00514.txt.bz2 On Tue, Jan 14, 2003 at 12:52:07AM -0500, Andrew Cagney wrote: > > >Some time ago Mark Kettenis updated i387-tdep.c to use frame_register_read > >for "info float". This changed the result of "info float" with no running > >program; I think for the better, and so did he, if I recall rightly. Can > >anyone think of a reason not to update the testsuite correspondingly, as > >with the attached patch? > > That message comes from print_float_info, so while possibly mark's > changes, it wouldn't be frame_register_read. Check with fernando, but i > think that all targets should always output that message. Thanks very much. I completely missed that line at the beginning of the function. Since I don't see anything else overriding print_float_info (i.e. changing the cfunc for the info command), you're probably right. -- Daniel Jacobowitz MontaVista Software Debian GNU/Linux Developer