Re: gdb.c++ vs dos names

Michael Elizabeth Chastain
2003-01-09T16:45:26Z

If you look in config/djgpp/fnchange.lst, every file in
testsuite/gdb.c++ is in there. I presume it's because of the gdb.c++.
All the new files like pr-574.exp need to be registered.

But I'm looking at my source+build directories for gcc_5_3-branch and
HEAD and I don't see any difference with 'Makefile.in' and 'Makefile'.

In both branch and trunk:

source dir for testsuite/gdb.c++ has a 'Makefile.in'
build dir for testsuite/gdb.c++ has a 'Makefile'

So I don't know why ari.doschk.bug has this for message for HEAD
and does not have it for gcc_5_3_branch.

Andrew C:
> I suspect that the new makefile stuff is forgetting to clean it up after
> a configure? (The script is run over a release, and not the files
> checked out of CVS).

Ermmm, it looks like an interaction between new makefile stuff and the
release process, neither of which I know very well.

Michael C