From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gdb-patches-return-21563-listarch-gdb-patches=sources.redhat.com@sources.redhat.com>
Received: (qmail 24459 invoked by alias); 7 Jan 2003 16:01:15 -0000
Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Subscribe: <mailto:gdb-patches-subscribe@sources.redhat.com>
List-Archive: <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/gdb-patches/>
List-Post: <mailto:gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com>
List-Help: <mailto:gdb-patches-help@sources.redhat.com>, <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/#faqs>
Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sources.redhat.com
Received: (qmail 24449 invoked from network); 7 Jan 2003 16:01:13 -0000
Received: from unknown (HELO duracef.shout.net) (204.253.184.12)
  by 209.249.29.67 with SMTP; 7 Jan 2003 16:01:13 -0000
Received: (from mec@localhost)
	by duracef.shout.net (8.11.6/8.11.6) id h07G0wf25310;
	Tue, 7 Jan 2003 10:00:58 -0600
Date: Tue, 07 Jan 2003 16:01:00 -0000
From: Michael Elizabeth Chastain <mec@shout.net>
Message-Id: <200301071600.h07G0wf25310@duracef.shout.net>
To: drow@mvista.com, gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com
Subject: Re: [patch/rfc] post-process the `maint print architecture' from gdb_mbuild.sh
X-SW-Source: 2003-01/txt/msg00278.txt.bz2

> It's as simple as "sed -e ... -e ... -e ... -e ... < input > output",
> isn't it?  Or via -f and a file, the same thing.

The problem is that the "-e ..." thingies are computed dynamically.
The "-f" idea would work though I think.

Michael C