From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gdb-patches-return-21551-listarch-gdb-patches=sources.redhat.com@sources.redhat.com>
Received: (qmail 27757 invoked by alias); 7 Jan 2003 04:05:15 -0000
Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Subscribe: <mailto:gdb-patches-subscribe@sources.redhat.com>
List-Archive: <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/gdb-patches/>
List-Post: <mailto:gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com>
List-Help: <mailto:gdb-patches-help@sources.redhat.com>, <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/#faqs>
Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sources.redhat.com
Received: (qmail 27750 invoked from network); 7 Jan 2003 04:05:13 -0000
Received: from unknown (HELO duracef.shout.net) (204.253.184.12)
  by 209.249.29.67 with SMTP; 7 Jan 2003 04:05:13 -0000
Received: (from mec@localhost)
	by duracef.shout.net (8.11.6/8.11.6) id h0744xi15460;
	Mon, 6 Jan 2003 22:04:59 -0600
Date: Tue, 07 Jan 2003 04:05:00 -0000
From: Michael Elizabeth Chastain <mec@shout.net>
Message-Id: <200301070404.h0744xi15460@duracef.shout.net>
To: ezannoni@redhat.com, msnyder@redhat.com
Subject: Re: [RFA/PATCH] breakpoint.c: fix until command
Cc: drow@mvista.com, gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com
X-SW-Source: 2003-01/txt/msg00266.txt.bz2

Michael Snyder writes:
> Ah, that's right.  I was thinking of that usage, but I forgot
> that it starts from the beginning.

Whoa, so did somebody who worked on gdb.c++/namespace.exp and
a few other files.  That might even be me!

  #
  # set it up at a breakpoint so we can play with the variable values
  #
  if ![runto_main] then {
    perror "couldn't run to breakpoint"
    continue
  }

  if ![runto 'marker1'] then {
    perror "couldn't run to marker1"
    continue
  }

Optimization opportunity!

Michael C