From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 22661 invoked by alias); 7 Jan 2003 03:53:53 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sources.redhat.com Received: (qmail 22653 invoked from network); 7 Jan 2003 03:53:52 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO duracef.shout.net) (204.253.184.12) by 209.249.29.67 with SMTP; 7 Jan 2003 03:53:52 -0000 Received: (from mec@localhost) by duracef.shout.net (8.11.6/8.11.6) id h073rco15337; Mon, 6 Jan 2003 21:53:38 -0600 Date: Tue, 07 Jan 2003 03:53:00 -0000 From: Michael Elizabeth Chastain Message-Id: <200301070353.h073rco15337@duracef.shout.net> To: ezannoni@redhat.com, msnyder@redhat.com Subject: Re: [RFA/PATCH] breakpoint.c: fix until command Cc: drow@mvista.com, gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com X-SW-Source: 2003-01/txt/msg00265.txt.bz2 Michael Snyder writes: > run-to? Psychologically, 'run-to' fits into a good niche, but it might run into abbreviation problems. If it doesn't run into abbreviation problems then I like it as a new name for this sort of thing. The original 'until' name is a bit weird. The point is to get out of a loop, so 'progress' or 'endloop' or 'outloop' or 'done' ... but 'until'?? Maybe somebody wanted a name that started with 'u' for easy abbreviation. Michael C