From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 31111 invoked by alias); 7 Jan 2003 01:12:50 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sources.redhat.com Received: (qmail 31100 invoked from network); 7 Jan 2003 01:12:49 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO crack.them.org) (65.125.64.184) by 209.249.29.67 with SMTP; 7 Jan 2003 01:12:49 -0000 Received: from nevyn.them.org ([66.93.61.169] ident=mail) by crack.them.org with asmtp (Exim 3.12 #1 (Debian)) id 18VkB1-0004sl-00 for ; Mon, 06 Jan 2003 21:13:15 -0600 Received: from drow by nevyn.them.org with local (Exim 3.36 #1 (Debian)) id 18ViIZ-0000xU-00 for ; Mon, 06 Jan 2003 20:12:55 -0500 Date: Tue, 07 Jan 2003 01:12:00 -0000 From: Daniel Jacobowitz To: gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com Subject: Re: coffread.c extension for DLLs without debugging symbols Message-ID: <20030107011255.GA3645@nevyn.them.org> Mail-Followup-To: gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com References: <20030104044408.GA7364@redhat.com> <20030104205130.GA9784@redhat.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.1i X-SW-Source: 2003-01/txt/msg00252.txt.bz2 On Tue, Jan 07, 2003 at 01:03:45AM -0000, Raoul Gough wrote: > Of course it would be good to share the code, but this kind of thing > won't fit into the generic BFD interface. One possibility would be to > expose a platform-specific interface from within the BFD internals. > Can anyone suggest a BFD maintainer to talk to about this? That should be pretty easy. Ask on binutils@sources.redhat.com. -- Daniel Jacobowitz MontaVista Software Debian GNU/Linux Developer