From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gdb-patches-return-21304-listarch-gdb-patches=sources.redhat.com@sources.redhat.com>
Received: (qmail 20931 invoked by alias); 2 Jan 2003 20:04:50 -0000
Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Subscribe: <mailto:gdb-patches-subscribe@sources.redhat.com>
List-Archive: <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/gdb-patches/>
List-Post: <mailto:gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com>
List-Help: <mailto:gdb-patches-help@sources.redhat.com>, <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/#faqs>
Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sources.redhat.com
Received: (qmail 20916 invoked from network); 2 Jan 2003 20:04:49 -0000
Received: from unknown (HELO duracef.shout.net) (204.253.184.12)
  by 209.249.29.67 with SMTP; 2 Jan 2003 20:04:49 -0000
Received: (from mec@localhost)
	by duracef.shout.net (8.11.6/8.11.6) id h02K4WT31218;
	Thu, 2 Jan 2003 14:04:32 -0600
Date: Thu, 02 Jan 2003 20:04:00 -0000
From: Michael Elizabeth Chastain <mec@shout.net>
Message-Id: <200301022004.h02K4WT31218@duracef.shout.net>
To: ac131313@redhat.com, gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com
Subject: Re: [patch/rfc] post-process the `maint print architecture' from gdb_mbuild.sh
X-SW-Source: 2003-01/txt/msg00019.txt.bz2

> Thoughts?

The idea sounds good to me.

Instead of ed'ing Gdb.log, how about just naming the first file
Gdb.out or Gdb-raw.log, and then sed'ing into Gdb.log.

Michael C